Feb 12 2008 - 3:20pm Looks like Paris is short at least one pet at the moment as her little kitty, Prada, has been repo'd. The cat was brought in for the ol' snip-snip, but never picked up again. Sigh.
I think her rep and kris kelley are playing equal parts here. does it say how long it has been since she hasn't picked up that cute little black kitten?
That poor kitty! I'm really starting to think she gets new pets because they make for a few good photo ops, then moves on to the next big thing. Anyone remember Tinkerbell? Then the many
other dogs?
It doesn't appear that she's actively trying to get the kitten back...so obviously she doesn't care enough about him or her to make that effort.
It really infuriates me when people treat animals as objects or possessions, something they can get rid of when they're bored with it, or tired of taking care of it. There are thousands of
neglected and abandoned animals in this country, and Paris is the poster child of a bad pet owner. She buys animals on a whim, and discards them when she's grown tired of them...or when it's
no longer press-worthy to photograph her with the pet.
And naming the kitten "Prada" just proves my point. A material possession. Thank God she didn't pick up the kitten, and hopefully it's name will get changed SOON.
If you have to have "your people" remember to look after your pets then you shouldn't have pets. They are each individual pet-owners responsibility, and if you can't handle the responsibility
don't have the animal, plain and simple.
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and
prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.
If you are already a member, or would like to receive email alerts as new comments are made, please login or register. Or connect with your Facebook account: .
Ikea
enVogue
Matthew Williamson
Like this? Be the first! Please login or register to like this
14 Comments Post a Comment
she is so ridiculous. i can't believe she didn't go pick up her cat. they are not toys. wtf?
1oh and im so glad her movie is a flop.
2I'm glad she forgot to pick the kitten up. It's better for the kitten that way.
3awww poor thing
4My kitty looks EXACTLY like that!
I think her rep and kris kelley are playing equal parts here. does it say how long it has been since she hasn't picked up that cute little black kitten?
5when I read this I immediately thought of a blind item that I read from Ted Casablanca about pet neglect and now believe that Paris is the culprit.
http://www.eonline.com/gossip/awful/blind/?uuid=3587202e-83b0-4dd1-9431-...
I hope taht kitty finds a loving and responsible home
6Aww, and that kitty is sooo cute! I hope a good owner finds her now!
7That poor kitty! I'm really starting to think she gets new pets because they make for a few good photo ops, then moves on to the next big thing. Anyone remember Tinkerbell? Then the many other dogs?
8Why didn't the adoption agency spay the kitten? Most other adoption agencies do that so that it's done and done.
9It doesn't appear that she's actively trying to get the kitten back...so obviously she doesn't care enough about him or her to make that effort.
It really infuriates me when people treat animals as objects or possessions, something they can get rid of when they're bored with it, or tired of taking care of it. There are thousands of neglected and abandoned animals in this country, and Paris is the poster child of a bad pet owner. She buys animals on a whim, and discards them when she's grown tired of them...or when it's no longer press-worthy to photograph her with the pet.
And naming the kitten "Prada" just proves my point. A material possession. Thank God she didn't pick up the kitten, and hopefully it's name will get changed SOON.
10bluesarahlou...well said!
11bluesarahlou- ditto! i am glad the cat will go to a new home where it will actually be appreciated!
12That girl doesn't deserve any more animals. Give them your money so they can be taken care of properly.
13If you have to have "your people" remember to look after your pets then you shouldn't have pets. They are each individual pet-owners responsibility, and if you can't handle the responsibility don't have the animal, plain and simple.
14Post New Comment
Please share your opinion with our community, but make sure it is on topic and follows our Community Rules. We moderate comments and prohibit personal attacks, threats, spam, lewd images, or the promotion of your personal website.