Yes, you read that right. Under consideration tonight by San Francisco's Commission of Animal Control and Welfare is an ordinance that would make it illegal to sell pets within city limits! This stems from a growing number of animals of all kinds abandoned or in shelters facing euthanization. While I most definitely agree with cutting down on puppy mill dogs, for example, this law would ban the sale of any "companion animal" — including dogs, cats, hamsters, mice, rats, chinchillas, guinea pigs, birds, snakes, and lizards — other than rabbits or ferrets (which are already illegal) and fish.
Believed to be the country's first such ban, on the one hand I think of the poor conditions of some animals in pet stores, and on the other I'm imagining a "black market" for small mammals.
What's Your Take: Doritos' Anti-Bark Collar Commercial?
Admittedly, I laughed when I saw this commercial on Super Bowl Sunday. The visual of a dog getting revenge on a taunting human hit home, but then I began to analyze the moral. Is it all in good fun or does it show that these collars are too cruel for a human (by his dramatic shocking) . . . but not too horrible to still use on pets?
What's Your Take: Oreo's Law?
This story begins with a pooch (not shown here) who was tossed out the window from six stories up by an insane person her owner. She was rescued by the ASPCA's Animal Cops, treated for her broken bones and other injuries by shelter's hospital, and named Oreo.

About five months later, she began acting aggressively toward people and other dogs in the NYC shelter and was set to be put down. However, another organization, Pets Alive, wanted to see if they could help her; their request was denied and the pooch was put down on Nov. 13 of last year. Based on this decision, Sen. Thomas Duane and Assembly Member Micah Kellner introduced "Oreo's Law," a statewide bill to prevent shelters from killing dogs and cats if a qualified 501(c)3 animal rescue group is willing to take them.
While I certainly don't want to see any animal suffer (or die), this does raise some questions for me — namely, what happens if the rescue then cannot "fix" or home the animal? Do you have an opinion about this legislation? Share your reasoning in the comments below.
What's Your Take: Could You Take Home the Wrong Dog?
Imagine your surprise if you picked up a dog from the kennel, only to find it's not your dog at all! When I first read about this unlikely story, I instantly dismissed it. I know North (and his crazy antics) and can't see how I could ever bring home a different dog and not realize it.
Well, in this story, neither black lab was picked up by her actual "parents" — LaiLa (seen here) was retrieved by the owner's niece and Bella by the owner's parents. When eventually reunited, they suspected something was wrong but assumed it was just an angry response to their prolonged absences. After a microchip scan, the real identities came out and the rightful swap happened.
Source: Stacey Peterson
What's Your Take: "Human" Names For Pets?
While traveling with my parents several years back, they made some "grown-up" friends at the resort. Later, running into one woman by the pool, my mom introduced me. The woman's response upon hearing my name: "Ohhh, that's my dog's name."

She was lucky I didn't push her into the water. Anyway, my pooch has a non-traditional human name but I'm not opposed to "people" names, as long as I don't have a bad association with that same one. P.S., after you vote, don't forget to play our Wacky Cat Name game to see if you get any name inspiration!
What's Your Take: Jon Gosselin's Dog Treatment Comment?
It's not uncommon to have some exasperation and exaggeration when describing a pet but, if talking to strangers, you have to assume every word will be taken literally. Jon Gosselin described his family's interaction with their two dogs to People:
Those kids beat them up, climb on them, pull their tails, bite at them, drag them around and everything you can imagine not to do to an animal, they've done.
There was then so much outcry — dozens of complaints to the local Humane Society of Berks County, Pa — that he issued a second statement:
Whenever my kids are with Shoka and Nala, everyone is carefully supervised to ensure that no one – dog or child – is injured. Shoka and Nala are loyal companions who we consider members of our family.
On the one hand, this could just be an exaggerated example of how tolerant the pups were and, on the other, he could be backtracking to change his tune. The Humane Society weighed in that they have no credible evidence of abuse so what do you think?
Photos courtesy of TLC
What's Your Take: Korea Clones Glow-in-the-Dark Doggies?
It seems that Korea just can't get enough of cloning, and this time it includes sea anemones and beagles. What does one have to do with the other, you ask? Normally nothing, but recently scientists have incorporated a glowing protein into a set of cloned beagles that makes them glow under infrared light. Not only does it make for an interesting (albeit creepy-looking) combo, but it also proves that you can insert specific genes into an animal, even if it's not from their own species.
This video I caught on AP, shows why the scientists engineered the beagles with the protein in the first place. Check it out, then tell me if you think this advancement is for the best . . . or for the worst.
What's Your Take: Should Dog Walkers Be Licensed?
Sadly, a pup can't tattle if there were too many other dogs on his walk or if it was 20 minutes shorter than you were paying for, but it's hard for me to understand how licensing dog walkers would help regulate this industry. Despite also popping up in 2007, the news in SF is that considering a required license is back on the table.
The idea is that San Francisco's Recreation and Park Department is facing some serious budgetary cuts and hope that forcing dog walkers to pay for a license would help the city recoup some of that money to fix the parks and other public spaces the dogs are using. On one hand, I would like more accountability for anyone I was entrusting with my lil guy but, in a city very limited in pet-friendly areas (compared to NYC), I'd want to see quite a few more dog runs open up before totally backing funds going towards this organization. With both those considerations in mind, how do you feel on the licensing issue?
Would You Provide Doggie's DNA to Stop Unscooped Poop?
I stoop to scoop and think all dog owners should too! I've already shared my frustration about those less responsible pet parents out there and was intrigued by this new plan in the city of Petah Tikva, Israel.
Dog owners are asked to stop in a vet's office to leave a mouth swab sample – the docs then can create a doggie DNA database to properly ID those messes left on the street. At this point it's just optional but the city will consider making it mandatory if the trial program succeeds. Now, I imagine most responsible pet owners would have no problem stopping in for this service if required (and rewarded), but what's the chance that the culprits would even bother?
What's Your Take: Is This Officer Heartless or Doing His Job?
It's rare when I'm so furious I can't even talk . . . or blog for that matter. When I first heard about this story, I was positive there had to be something more — the idea that the police would pull over a person for speeding, see a dying pet, and simply say "it's just a dog, you can get another" is beyond me.